Classical / Classical era · 1968
Beethoven: Piano Concerto No. 5 Emperor
Emil Gilels / George Szell / Cleveland Orchestra
베토벤: 피아노 협주곡 5번 「황제」 · 에밀 길렐스 / 조지 셀 / 클리블랜드
Why listen
A concerto whose brilliant opening and carefully connected final movements reveal different kinds of partnership between soloist and orchestra.
Listen and read
Tracks · previews
English editorial edition
Album story
An orchestral chord and an immediate piano response establish the Emperor Concerto’s partnership before a conventional long opening could unfold. But the spectacular entrance does not define everything that follows. The delicate transition from the slow movement into the finale offers another way to hear the design. Compare these two beginnings in Emil Gilels’s recording with George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra.
Warner and the Gilels Foundation identify the recording as part of the 1968 Cleveland cycle. It is distinct from Gilels’s 1957 account with Leopold Ludwig and the Philharmonia. This presentation selects all three complete movements from the current collection’s 1996 remaster lineage, excluding the other concertos and solo variations. The opening movement lasts approximately as long as the other two combined.
An opening flourish belongs to the structure
The piano’s initial brilliance is not simply an invitation to insert an unconstrained display. Beethoven writes the solo passages into the course of the concerto. Recall that entrance when the orchestra begins its fuller exposition, and consider how the opening prepares a much larger movement. Technical display and structural purpose can be heard working together rather than competing for attention.
Follow the changes of responsibility
A concerto does not keep the soloist permanently in the foreground. When the piano rests, follow how far the orchestra carries the music; when it returns, notice how the material changes under the keyboard. This offers a more concrete route than applying reputations for Gilels’s power or Szell’s precision to every bar. The first movement’s scale contains changing densities and responsibilities.
Keep the last two movements connected
Near the end of the Adagio, the piano anticipates the next movement before the rondo begins. A rondo brings its main idea back between contrasting episodes. Listen for the transformation from tentative suggestion to energetic departure. Separate digital tracks do not imply an intended pause in the composition. Hearing the transition can change the slow melody’s effect compared with treating it as an isolated miniature.
The album through its tracks
Compare the opening chord and piano response, then keep the Adagio and rondo together as one continuous final stretch.
I. Allegro
This is the full opening movement, approximately 20:17 long. Separate the orchestra’s initial chords from the piano’s flourishes, then attend to the more extended orchestral argument that follows. The early solo entrance is only the beginning of their relationship. Waiting for the piano’s return reveals how an instrument that initially decorates can also carry the development of musical ideas. A cadenza usually showcases the soloist, but Beethoven writes the relevant passage into the concerto’s course rather than leaving an unrestricted addition. Listen for the handover back to the orchestra. The linked recording is the complete movement from the specified 1968 performance, not the much shorter excerpt also circulating under an Allegro title.
Reference · Qobuz / Warner — complete Emperor movements, 1968/1996 rights and personnelII. Adagio un poco mosso
The slow movement lasts approximately 8:56 and leads into the rondo. Compare who carries the melody and who supplies its setting as piano and orchestra exchange responsibilities. Quietness does not make either partner unimportant. Near the conclusion, the piano hints at the coming movement before that idea becomes an active new beginning. A track boundary in a digital list should not be mistaken for a compositional pause. A short preview cannot demonstrate this entire transition, so continue through the complete movement when listening to the full recording. Both this selection and the following rondo belong to the same Gilels, Szell and Cleveland performance rather than a mixture of recordings.
Reference · Aspen Music Festival — Beethoven Fifth Concerto structure and written cadenza
Listen next
Continue to Heifetz and Munch’s 1955 Beethoven Violin Concerto and compare the solo instrument’s articulation and manner of entering the orchestral argument.
Beethoven: Violin Concerto ↗References & editorial note
Written for English readers. Album facts are referenced below; listening suggestions are editorial interpretations. AI-assisted editorial review; not independently human-reviewed.
- Warner Classics — Gilels, Szell and Cleveland 1968 cycle · www.warnerclassics.com
- Emil Gilels Foundation — EMI discography, 1968 and 1957 recordings distinguished · www.emilgilels.com
- Qobuz / Warner — complete Emperor movements, 1968/1996 rights and personnel · www.qobuz.com
- Aspen Music Festival — Beethoven Fifth Concerto structure and written cadenza · www.aspenmusicfestival.com
- Apple Music — complete concertos and variations, source collection · music.apple.com